Contract Situation

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

Horse15
Novice
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2023 3:56 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by Horse15 »

Neill_M wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:05 pm
Horse15 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 10:48 pm
Thelaw wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:52 pm Perhaps the irfu could help out someone other than Munster for a change. No reason the under 20s six nations couldn't move north now for a couple of years, should help with the Bank Balance
I don’t think these games would be much of a money spinner - avg attendances in or around 4K.
Musgrave Park was sold out for the two games v England and France last season, holds 8,008. The Scotland game in 2022 was also sold out and the Welsh game in 2022 got 7,289 at it.
Fair enough - Ireland do well as avg at all games was c4k. I
Could make a few bob with 7-8k.
Lurgan Lad
Warrior Chief
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:27 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by Lurgan Lad »

Anybody ever read the Annual Report, tonight is the first time I've ever seen it and it really is an eye opener. Never realised just how small our turnover is, no wonder we need to cut costs!

https://ulster.rugby/rugby-in-ulster/ul ... ual-report
User avatar
Columbo
Steward
Posts: 804
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:56 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by Columbo »

SUFTUM_19 wrote:
Thelaw wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:48 pm I think the more worrying part of the report is that we are doing this as part of a cost cutting exercise. That means there will be no big money NIQ replacement. Or I think any replacement at all. If the Leinster players were moving they would go to Munster, just like carberry, though that was a lucky miss. It looks like we have been told no by Dublin, they are going to support the 3 southern teams first and we can make do and mend. There is definitely some dead wood, Addison has been woeful for example. Maybe a season with kids coming through wouldn't be the worst if we can get are heads around it. But management changes are nessecary
Judging by the rumour that we are prepared to offload our starting 10 to save money, with no real sign of a replacement, there is absolutely no chance we are in a position to afford to release coaches from their contracts a year early, so whilst I do agree that management changes are necessary, I don’t think it’s possible and we’re just going to have to stick it out for the next season and a half. It makes the whole plastic pitch decision even more confusing if finances are as bad as they seem to be.
I think that the cost-cutting / budget angle is being over-played a bit. All of the provincial branches run at a loss and require subsidy from the centre in one form or another. I think some people lose sight of the fact that Ulster (and the other provinces) “are” the IRFU, not some independent third party. Every professional player in Ireland is contracted with the IRFU. The system of central contracting and player recharges is supposed to incentivise production of international players but ultimately all player costs are borne by the IRFU.

This gives the IRFU (by which I mean the D4 management cadre) a great deal of leverage over the provincial flunkies. When is a CEO not a CEO? Answer when he is “CEO” of a province. The provincial CEO is in effect a local ops manager.

So I don’t think it’s correct framing to say that Ulster are in a fire sale because of budgetary pressure - although it is true that across the board in Ireland, rugby in general is under increased budgetary pressure in the last couple of years. There will likely be belt tightening around the fringes of the squad, and more recourse to academies in all 4 provinces, but it’s absolutely not in the IRFU’s interests to let Ulster go to the wall because they can’t “afford” an out-half!

As for Billy, I’ve heard it said that it’s not so much that he isn’t being renewed, more that he’s keen to see what’s out there, which is fair enough. There would be big pressure on Leinster to move on one of their 10s - I reckon they would dig their heels in on Prendergast, and I don’t think they’d be keen to lose Frawley because of his quality and versatility. I reckon if push came to shove they might prefer to keep Ross Byrne and let Harry go. Harry was superb at u-20 level but with injuries and lack of opportunities has struggled to get any kind of run going at Leinster. Ulster would be a good move for him. We’ll see..

Going back to the IRFU’s leverage - while I think the budget piece is over-played, they need as close to all 4 provinces threatening home knock-out games etc as possible, and it’s abundantly clear that Dan is at sea. I would agree that coming up with a compromise agreement and paying him off wouldn’t be likely, on top of the recent financial shambles - but sacking him for performance-related reasons, if possible, would not entail a pay-out… also I know that on at least one occasion HR had to step in because of some of Dan’s behaviours - another potential avenue to terminating a contract?

My own guess is that neither Petrie nor McFarland will be about the place come the start of next season…
..one more thing
Big-al
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5045
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:20 am

Re: Contract Situation

Post by Big-al »

Billy may be keen to explore other options, but if he’s not being offered an Ulster contract of any sort, then he’s not being offered a contract.

If Ulster wanted to keep him, they’d have offered him some sort of deal.
Can’t be spun any other way.
justinr73
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 6034
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by justinr73 »

That ignores the possibility of him informing the club he will be leaving at the expiry of his contract.
Big-al
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5045
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:20 am

Re: Contract Situation

Post by Big-al »

justinr73 wrote: Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:59 am That ignores the possibility of him informing the club he will be leaving at the expiry of his contract.
And if they wanted to keep him they’d still have made an offer of some sort. He had no contract on the table from Ulster and went looking elsewhere.
justinr73
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 6034
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by justinr73 »

Hold on, when I rashly expressed my intention to cash in my chips after 24 years to move over here and my Chief Executive shook my hand and wished me good luck, are you saying they wanted rid of me?

bar steward
Big-al
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5045
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:20 am

Re: Contract Situation

Post by Big-al »

If they told you before you looked elsewhere that they didn’t need you anymore then, yes, they were.
Last edited by Big-al on Wed Jan 31, 2024 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
UlsterAreBrill
Initiate
Posts: 595
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:30 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by UlsterAreBrill »

SUFTUM_19 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:58 pm
Thelaw wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:48 pm I think the more worrying part of the report is that we are doing this as part of a cost cutting exercise. That means there will be no big money NIQ replacement. Or I think any replacement at all. If the Leinster players were moving they would go to Munster, just like carberry, though that was a lucky miss. It looks like we have been told no by Dublin, they are going to support the 3 southern teams first and we can make do and mend. There is definitely some dead wood, Addison has been woeful for example. Maybe a season with kids coming through wouldn't be the worst if we can get are heads around it. But management changes are nessecary
Judging by the rumour that we are prepared to offload our starting 10 to save money, with no real sign of a replacement, there is absolutely no chance we are in a position to afford to release coaches from their contracts a year early, so whilst I do agree that management changes are necessary, I don’t think it’s possible and we’re just going to have to stick it out for the next season and a half. It makes the whole plastic pitch decision even more confusing if finances are as bad as they seem to be.
Maybe we are cost cutting to find money to sack the team. Sacrificing Burns for McFarland and Bell is a shrewd move, if it was the case.

The budget is poor but a large part of the artificial pitch is to allow for more events (rugby and non rugby) to be held there, or so i’m told.
User avatar
HammerTime
Warrior Assassin
Posts: 1292
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:02 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by HammerTime »

UlsterAreBrill wrote: Wed Jan 31, 2024 9:59 am
SUFTUM_19 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:58 pm
Thelaw wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:48 pm I think the more worrying part of the report is that we are doing this as part of a cost cutting exercise. That means there will be no big money NIQ replacement. Or I think any replacement at all. If the Leinster players were moving they would go to Munster, just like carberry, though that was a lucky miss. It looks like we have been told no by Dublin, they are going to support the 3 southern teams first and we can make do and mend. There is definitely some dead wood, Addison has been woeful for example. Maybe a season with kids coming through wouldn't be the worst if we can get are heads around it. But management changes are nessecary
Judging by the rumour that we are prepared to offload our starting 10 to save money, with no real sign of a replacement, there is absolutely no chance we are in a position to afford to release coaches from their contracts a year early, so whilst I do agree that management changes are necessary, I don’t think it’s possible and we’re just going to have to stick it out for the next season and a half. It makes the whole plastic pitch decision even more confusing if finances are as bad as they seem to be.
Maybe we are cost cutting to find money to sack the team. Sacrificing Burns for McFarland and Bell is a shrewd move, if it was the case.

The budget is poor but a large part of the artificial pitch is to allow for more events (rugby and non rugby) to be held there, or so i’m told.
Well it's Feb now basically and there's nothing booked for this summer. These big events are usually booked 8-9 months in advance at least.
jean valjean
Chancellor to the King
Posts: 3196
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:03 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by jean valjean »

HammerTime wrote:
UlsterAreBrill wrote: Wed Jan 31, 2024 9:59 am
SUFTUM_19 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:58 pm
Thelaw wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:48 pm I think the more worrying part of the report is that we are doing this as part of a cost cutting exercise. That means there will be no big money NIQ replacement. Or I think any replacement at all. If the Leinster players were moving they would go to Munster, just like carberry, though that was a lucky miss. It looks like we have been told no by Dublin, they are going to support the 3 southern teams first and we can make do and mend. There is definitely some dead wood, Addison has been woeful for example. Maybe a season with kids coming through wouldn't be the worst if we can get are heads around it. But management changes are nessecary
Judging by the rumour that we are prepared to offload our starting 10 to save money, with no real sign of a replacement, there is absolutely no chance we are in a position to afford to release coaches from their contracts a year early, so whilst I do agree that management changes are necessary, I don’t think it’s possible and we’re just going to have to stick it out for the next season and a half. It makes the whole plastic pitch decision even more confusing if finances are as bad as they seem to be.
Maybe we are cost cutting to find money to sack the team. Sacrificing Burns for McFarland and Bell is a shrewd move, if it was the case.

The budget is poor but a large part of the artificial pitch is to allow for more events (rugby and non rugby) to be held there, or so i’m told.
Well it's Feb now basically and there's nothing booked for this summer. These big events are usually booked 8-9 months in advance at least.
Is there not a limit on the number of games / events that have been agreed with the local concerned residents? Suspect holding concerts etc will require a raft of discussions with the council and residents.
promenader 2
Initiate
Posts: 321
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 12:33 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by promenader 2 »

justinr73 wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 7:49 pm Hmmm, not really.

There’s frequently a painful play-off defeat but most Ulster fans only see about three losses a year.
When the 3 matches are usually the crucial play-off/knockout ones, I count that as painful. The end result is the same - we win fcuk all, season after season 👍
justinr73
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 6034
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: Contract Situation

Post by justinr73 »

Lucky for us the IRFU centrally contracted their fourth choice lock.
CIMANFOREVER
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: The Dufferin

Re: Contract Situation

Post by CIMANFOREVER »

justinr73 wrote: Thu Feb 01, 2024 12:06 am Lucky for us the IRFU centrally contracted their fourth choice lock.
To hold tackle bags
Exterminate all rational thought
User avatar
mid ulster maestro
Warrior Chief
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: The Sticks

Re: Contract Situation

Post by mid ulster maestro »

Shouldn't get too injured doing that.
When the bottom has fallen out of your world.
Take Enos and let the world fall out of your bottom!
Post Reply