Treviso v Ulster

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Rovi Snave
Warrior
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:14 pm
Location: Holywood, but preferably the Terrace

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Rovi Snave »

"Nick Williams was unavailable for selection"

Anyone have a clue as to what the above means :scratch:

If he's injured than why not just say so?
Finished
User avatar
BaggyTrousers
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 30337
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:29 pm
Location: España

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by BaggyTrousers »

With that crap Treviso team, our strongish team, the fact that it will be a Sucre-free zone, I expect a thunderingly good 5 pointer .................. always excepting the possibility that Clancy may wish to act the frigging arsewipe.
NEVER MOVE ON. Years on, I cannot ever watch Ireland with anything but indifference, I continue to wish for the imminent death of Donal Spring, the FIRFUC's executioner of Wee Paddy & Wee Stu, and I hate the FIRFUCs with undiminished passion.
User avatar
Mac
Chancellor to the King
Posts: 3918
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:04 am
Location: Paris, Texas.

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Mac »

BaggyTrousers wrote:With that crap Treviso team, our strongish team, the fact that it will be a Sucre-free zone, I expect a thunderingly good 5 pointer .................. always excepting the possibility that Clancy may wish to act the frigging arsewipe.
Bagster, never tempt fate with CLOWNCY............ :shock:
Attachments
George.png
George.png (138.72 KiB) Viewed 1015 times
Image Image
If You Have To Ask....You Don't Understand
User avatar
Cap'n Grumpy
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 15745
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Cap'n Grumpy »

Rovi Snave wrote:"Nick Williams was unavailable for selection"

Anyone have a clue as to what the above means :scratch:

If he's injured than why not just say so?
Probably wrong, but it smacks to me of management speak for a disciplinary! :shock:
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
User avatar
Joe Schmo
Chancellor to the King
Posts: 3767
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:13 am

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Joe Schmo »

Oh we're a cruel bunch! :lol: I don't recognise too maybe of that pack, in fact only Williams in backs. Should be a five pointer if we keep Clancy happy in the scrum and at the breakdown. With Cave back at 13 and Jared back at 15, the balance has been restored and I predict young Gilroy to run a few in. As keep the error count low and boys should be able run a few in. Dry conditions will help.
User avatar
BR
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 18579
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:12 am
Location: On a roll.

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by BR »

Only a couple of full changes from the Treviso side who were so poor against the Os (good lot of positionlal changes). It seemed to take the welsh an age to work out that all they had to do was run at their 3/4 line to make a breakthrough. Hopefully we will have that sussed from the opening minutes. I think we have the better players 1 thru 15 and beyond. I'll be dissapointed with annything less than 5 league points.
Can I come out from behind the sofa yet?
www.stoutboys.co.uk
User avatar
BR
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 18579
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:12 am
Location: On a roll.

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by BR »

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:
Rovi Snave wrote:"Nick Williams was unavailable for selection"

Anyone have a clue as to what the above means :scratch:

If he's injured than why not just say so?
Probably wrong, but it smacks to me of management speak for a disciplinary! :shock:
That's what I thought too, has he been snacking between meals agin? :stir:
Can I come out from behind the sofa yet?
www.stoutboys.co.uk
User avatar
UpAtSix
Initiate
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by UpAtSix »

Joe Schmo wrote:Oh we're a cruel bunch! :lol: I don't recognise too maybe of that pack, in fact only Williams in backs.
The half-back pairing are both internationals, so we'll still have to do the dog work on the ground to deny them a platform. Get our mental preparation right and there's no reason for Treviso to score any points at all.

Sure, we even managed to put a bonus point on them when we were playing in conditions comparable to a Dutch coffee shop!
User avatar
Joe Schmo
Chancellor to the King
Posts: 3767
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:13 am

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Joe Schmo »

Where has the Treviso team disappeared to? I'm sure someone had posted it yesterday. :scratch:
Rovi Snave
Warrior
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:14 pm
Location: Holywood, but preferably the Terrace

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Rovi Snave »

BR wrote:
Cap'n Grumpy wrote:
Rovi Snave wrote:"Nick Williams was unavailable for selection"

Anyone have a clue as to what the above means :scratch:

If he's injured than why not just say so?
Probably wrong, but it smacks to me of management speak for a disciplinary! :shock:
That's what I thought too, has he been snacking between meals agin? :stir:
:lol: Now I have this image in my mind of Nick sitting on the naughty step :shock:
Finished
bazzaj

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by bazzaj »

BaggyTrousers wrote:Well BR, strongish I'd say but then again, I had been expecting BBJ & Fat Nick to be participants & verily thon wud huv bin strong.

We have a bench that wouldn't look out of place for Treviso. :shock:
Make that a double :shock: :shock:
Reverse impact whatever that is.
User avatar
Eggs
Warrior Chief
Posts: 1671
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:10 pm

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Eggs »

Come on now lads, Im all for showing respect to the opposition, but if we can't get a BP win against that lot on a dry day, then we don't deserve to be in the top four
User avatar
ColinM
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7858
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:11 pm

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by ColinM »

Rovi Snave wrote:
BR wrote:
Cap'n Grumpy wrote:
Rovi Snave wrote:"Nick Williams was unavailable for selection"

Anyone have a clue as to what the above means :scratch:

If he's injured than why not just say so?
Probably wrong, but it smacks to me of management speak for a disciplinary! :shock:
That's what I thought too, has he been snacking between meals agin? :stir:
:lol: Now I have this image in my mind of Nick sitting on the naughty step :shock:
with a bargain bucket.
User avatar
Indiana
Novice
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:29 am
Location: Qatar

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Indiana »

Joe Schmo wrote:Where has the Treviso team disappeared to? I'm sure someone had posted it yesterday. :scratch:

here ya go me old china!

TEAMS
Treviso: B Williams; L Nitoglia, A Sgarbi, E Bacchin, A Pratichetti; M Berquist, F Semenzato; M Muccignat, F Sbaraglin, I Fernandez-Rouyet; A Pavanello (capt), V Bernabo; M Vosawai, M Swanepoel, M Filippucci. Replacements: E Ceccato, G Maistri, R Acosta, C Van Zyl, E Lubian, A Lucchese, J Van Niekerk, Alberto Di Bernardo
Ulster: J Payne; C Gilroy, D Cave, L Marshall, M Allen; R Pienaar, P Marshall; T Court, R Herring, R Lutton; J Muller (capt), L Stevenson; R Diack, S Doyle, R Wilson. Replacements: N Annett, C Black, A Macklin, N McComb, M McComish, M Heaney, R Andrew, R Scholes.
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.

Mark Twain
User avatar
Joe Schmo
Chancellor to the King
Posts: 3767
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:13 am

Re: Treviso v Ulster

Post by Joe Schmo »

UpAtSix wrote:
Joe Schmo wrote:Oh we're a cruel bunch! :lol: I don't recognise too maybe of that pack, in fact only Williams in backs.
The half-back pairing are both internationals, so we'll still have to do the dog work on the ground to deny them a platform. Get our mental preparation right and there's no reason for Treviso to score any points at all.

Sure, we even managed to put a bonus point on them when we were playing in conditions comparable to a Dutch coffee shop!
I take it back, with the exception of Bergquist and Bacchin they're all Italian internationals :lol: :duh: Bergquist used to be with Leinster a few seasons ago, but Madigan had a nicer hair do, so he had to go.

Still think, we have enough for the 5 points.
Post Reply