Wee Woman wrote:Fly Half wrote:
Why not write a letter to each individual you are unhappy with, expressing your disappointment, and how you expect them to behave or improve? As has been mentioned before, some players tried their hardest, so is it fair that they are booed? What about those players who did "deserve" it, did they know it was directed specifically at them?
Like a letter from me to each 'individual' is going to change anything - are you a school teacher or something??
Saying that, you write away if you really believe that it will change a single thing - you must have plenty of time on your hands. I await with anticipation any replies you might receive.
... and booing changes what exactly? I take it you can't be bothered to write then - so it's obviously not that important to you. I don't intend to write as I personally don't think that criticism is what the team needs. IMO it is not helpful to kick them when they are already down, however if someone feels the need to do so, writing would be better than booing as it at least shows personal commitment.
Wee Woman wrote:Fly Half wrote:
Booing is negative, indiscriminate and destructive, probably the last thing the team needs at the moment.
I'm rubbing my slapped wrists concerning your last statement - I'm a married woman in my thirties and have just been give my first cyber b*ll*cking - it would be funny if the issue wasn't so bloomin frustrating.
I'm none of the above and still make no apology for booing. In fact, if we get another dire result like the Glasgow one this Friday I might even consider booing again - or do I need your permission first???
I've had to re-read my post quite a few times to see what constitutes a "cyber b*ll*cking", but if that's what you think, then I'll take your word for it. Since you mention the "last statement", I take it you consider booing to be positive, specific and constructive?
(if you want to boo again of course you'll need my permission, unlicensed booing is the first step towards anarchy and can only be tolerated if I receive £20 in a brown envelope.)
Wee Woman wrote:
Typical example of how this issue has been hi-jacked by the hoo-ray henrys IMO.
Bottom line is, no amount of pontificating on your part is going to stop supporters expressing how they feel and no amount of letters to individuals from individual supporters is going to change a jot.
I've never been called a "hoo-ray henry" before but hey there's a first time for everything - who knows I might be booing next, spluttering my champagne and prawn sandwiches over the great unwashed? (Oops did I say champers - I meant Schloer of course, there's not the same amount of drink at Ravers these days.)
However, I see you have entirely missed the point of my post - I am not seeking "to stop supporters expressing how they feel", but rather encourage them to express those feelings in a more constructive and specific way. In this technological age, hardly anyone writes letters any more because of text, e-mail, MBs whatever. A letter shows the recipient that the sender is affected deeply enough to be bothered to do something more than a contemptuous hoot of derision from an anonymous crowd.