YoungMan wrote:LI made their compliant, it was found to be unjust, surely they should have been fined of made to pay all costs, as should Dragons "if" found to be the same ......it appears that you can make any allegation you want with out fear of repercussions.
There are two separate issues here - the correct process for making a complaint and the investigation of the complaint itself.
The LI complaint wasn't found to be "unjust" - the adjudication was there was insufficient evidence to progress the case.
The same could happen to Ulster. For example, an Ulster player says his b0ll0x were grabbed in the middle of a ruck, Ulster make a complaint, suspecting a particular player but that player denies it and there is no evidence to take the case further. Should Ulster be fined and ordered to pay all costs?
The whole point of making an official complaint is to formalise the collection and presentation of evidence, but you can't pre-judge if the evidence will be sufficient or not.
My view is that if a complaint is made by official channels and is dismissed, the complainant shouldn't be penalised for making it.
If a complaint is made outside of official channels and we end up in a "trial by media" situation, then there is a case for the complainant to be sanctioned for this - but as you say, there does need to be rules or guidelines for this to happen in the first place.