Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life,

[Dave]

Nahae: you are the shyte scrapped off flegz boxers that have been festering in trap 2 during the off season...the toilet hasn't been flushed since bakebookers crapped themselves at the baabaas cup final having scoffed too much free church curry. I wish you 1000 ring burning minutes of flesh eating liquid poop eviscerating your anal cavities and singeing the hair on the back of your balls.

Good night and go fcuk yourself ( dickhead )

[bazzaj]

It is just that we should be grateful, not only to those with whose views we may agree, but also to those who have expressed more superficial views; for these also contributed something, by developing before us the powers of thought.

and now You can avoid the creator, but you cannot say He doesn't exist. Whether or not you accept the creator's authority is your business; but you cannot say there is no creator.

For example :- there are so many outlaws who say, "We don't want to obey the government." If you don't like the government, that is your business. But there is a government -- you can't deny that.

Different men seek after happiness in different ways and by different means, and so make for themselves different modes of life and forms of government.

Persuasion is achieved by the speaker's personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible. We believe good men more fully and more readily than others: this is true generally whatever the question is, and absolutely true where exact certainty is impossible and opinions are divided.

[Rooster]

It is just that we should be grateful, not only to those with whose views we may agree, but also to those who have expressed more superficial views; for these also contributed something, by developing before us the powers of thought.

and now You can avoid the creator, but you cannot say He doesn't exist. Whether or not you accept the creator's authority is your business; but you cannot say there is no creator.

For example :- there are so many outlaws who say, "We don't want to obey the government." If you don't like the government, that is your business. But there is a government -- you can't deny that.

Different men seek after happiness in different ways and by different means, and so make for themselves different modes of life and forms of government.

Persuasion is achieved by the speaker's personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible. We believe good men more fully and more readily than others: this is true generally whatever the question is, and absolutely true where exact certainty is impossible and opinions are divided.

Bazz what they heck are you drinking as I could do with shower of it

[big mervyn]

The pen of his aunt is in his uncle.

[nahae]

It is just that we should be grateful, not only to those with whose views we may agree, but also to those who have expressed more superficial views; for these also contributed something, by developing before us the powers of thought.

and now You can avoid the creator, but you cannot say He doesn't exist. Whether or not you accept the creator's authority is your business; but you cannot say there is no creator.

For example :- there are so many outlaws who say, "We don't want to obey the government." If you don't like the government, that is your business. But there is a government -- you can't deny that.

Different men seek after happiness in different ways and by different means, and so make for themselves different modes of life and forms of government.

Persuasion is achieved by the speaker's personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible. We believe good men more fully and more readily than others: this is true generally whatever the question is, and absolutely true where exact certainty is impossible and opinions are divided.

we are not talking of what is good or bad. and government is no ones person servent ( or say private property ) as you act you get the result. that is all.

and now weather you accept creators authority or not that is your business. but you cannot say that there is no government.

[bazzaj]

Whether if soul did not exist time would exist or not, is a question that may fairly be asked; for if there cannot be someone to count there cannot be anything that can be counted, so that evidently there cannot be number; for number is either what has been, or what can be, counted.

[nahae]

The pen of his aunt is in his uncle.

and *fraud hypocrite* what happened to that question ? that how parents are fools who want to educate there childerns ?

there is no satisfying answer at all. prostitute hunters are posing like first class saints. ( just see the fun ) what is that called ? bachelor daddies.

[nahae]

Whether if soul did not exist time would exist or not, is a question that may fairly be asked; for if there cannot be someone to count there cannot be anything that can be counted, so that evidently there cannot be number; for number is either what has been, or what can be, counted.

but where is your seeing power ? so that you will see soul ? the measurement of soul is given. it is 10000 part of the tip of hair. so where is your seeing power ?

you cannot see anything at all even in morning without sunlight. and what to speak of night without light ? so practically your seeing power is already conditional. but still you are challening on soul ? ( just see the fun )

practically you are already blind if there is no sun light and what to speak of night without light ? so again where is your seeing power ?

[bazzaj]

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.

[nahae]

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.

and what is that ignorance ? what is it ? i m not speaking something from my own but im speaking what previous big big authority has spoken.

and what is your science ? can you tell us the name of your 10th grandfather ? OR your 10th grandfathers, 10th grandfathers, grandfather ? can you tell us the name of him ? if not then how can you jump beyond him ?

and how can i accept your imaginations like evolution, big bang, life comes from matter, position of universe, moon landing, this or that etc ?

since it is just an imaginations cuz you cannot tell us the name of your 10th grandfather. and to speak nothing of 10th grandfathers, 10th grandfathers, grandfather.

but still i have to accept your nonsense imaginations in the name of science as facts ? ( just see the folly ) and what explanation your scientsits has got ? what explanation they have ? other than these cheap words which are = by chance, maybe, i guess etc ?

so kindly explain your solid, verifialbe and tangible explanation which supports your western great great scientits. so that we can see what is what.

and if you nothing than who is accepting you also ? who accepts you `1st of all ?

[bazzaj]

We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universes, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.

I have steadily endeavoured to keep my mind free so as to give up any hypothesis, however much beloved (and I cannot resist forming one on every subject), as soon as facts are shown to be opposed to it.

[nahae]

We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universes, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.

I have steadily endeavoured to keep my mind free so as to give up any hypothesis, however much beloved (and I cannot resist forming one on every subject), as soon as facts are shown to be opposed to it.

so you have satellites, google, iphone, computer, wikipidea this or that etc. does it means that you can tell us the name of your 10th grandfathers ? does it means that you can tell us the name of your 10th grandfather ?

and what to speak of your 10th grandfathers. 10th grandfathers, grandfather ? what to speak of him even ?

in spite of all this material advancement can you tell us the name of him ? if not than how can you go beyond him ? and tell us what is what ?? like evolution, big bang, moon landing, position of universe, life comes from matter, this or that etc ?

how can you go beyond your 10th grandfather ? ( nonsense idiot ) thus you are failure. and where is example that people learns something from failure ? where is such example ?

so who is accepting you ? who accepts your imaginations which are beyond your 10th grandfather ? in the name of science ? who accepts you ?

and what explanation your scientists has ? what explanation they has ? what authority they has ?
_______________

and the scientific method means first observation, then hypothesis, and then demonstration. But your scientists cannot demonstrate their hypothesis. They simply observe and then speak nonsense. that is all.

[Russ]

We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universes, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.

so you have satellites, google, iphone, computer, wikipidea this or that etc. does it means that you can tell us the name of your 10th grandfathers ? does it means that you can tell us the name of your 10th grandfather ?

and what to speak of your 10th grandfathers. 10th grandfathers, grandfather ? what to speak of him even ?

in spite of all this material advancement can you tell us the name of him ? if not than how can you go beyond him ? and tell us what is what ?? like evolution, big bang, moon landing, position of universe, life comes from matter, this or that etc ?

how can you go beyond your 10th grandfather ? ( nonsense idiot ) thus you are failure. and where is example that people learns something from failure ? where is such example ?

so who is accepting you ? who accepts your imaginations which are beyond your 10th grandfather ? in the name of science ? who accepts you ?

and what explanation your scientists has ? what explanation they has ? what authority they has ?

Ive already answered this

Oisin McConville

Then my neighbour is Bill

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[bazzaj]

We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universes, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.

I have steadily endeavoured to keep my mind free so as to give up any hypothesis, however much beloved (and I cannot resist forming one on every subject), as soon as facts are shown to be opposed to it.

so you have satellites, google, iphone, computer, wikipidea this or that etc. does it means that you can tell us the name of your 10th grandfathers ? does it means that you can tell us the name of your 10th grandfather ?

and what to speak of your 10th grandfathers. 10th grandfathers, grandfather ? what to speak of him even ?

in spite of all this material advancement can you tell us the name of him ? if not than how can you go beyond him ? and tell us what is what ?? like evolution, big bang, moon landing, position of universe, life comes from matter, this or that etc ?

how can you go beyond your 10th grandfather ? ( nonsense idiot ) thus you are failure. and where is example that people learns something from failure ? where is such example ?

so who is accepting you ? who accepts your imaginations which are beyond your 10th grandfather ? in the name of science ? who accepts you ?

and what explanation your scientists has ? what explanation they has ? what authority they has ?
_______________

and the scientific method means first observation, then hypothesis, and then demonstration. But your scientists cannot demonstrate their hypothesis. They simply observe and then speak nonsense. that is all.

I do sometimes accuse people of ignorance, but that is not intended to be an insult. I'm ignorant of lots of things. Ignorance is something that can be remedied by education.


There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?

The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.

[UlsterNo9]

Cannot wait until Rum walks through the turnstiles of this thread.