I wonder who the threatened legal action would have been against if they had been refused? Surely the fact that the eprc moved the game then ulster would have no liability against claims from LR fans. Maybe the threat was enough to roll over and get our bellies tickled.Dave wrote:They were allowed in.Big-al wrote:Photos on social media of a significant very vocal group of La Rochelle entourage at the stadium.Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:49 pm That is a disgrace - ROG giving instruction from the sidelines when he's not even meant to be in the stadium.
Hmmm, please tell me their travelling support weren’t allowed at the match?
Next season's Heineken Cup
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Chancellor to the King
- Posts: 3158
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:03 pm
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15684
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Pay attention buster -Dave wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:45 pmThey were allowed in.Big-al wrote:Photos on social media of a significant very vocal group of La Rochelle entourage at the stadium.Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:49 pm That is a disgrace - ROG giving instruction from the sidelines when he's not even meant to be in the stadium.
Hmmm, please tell me their travelling support weren’t allowed at the match?
He asked you to tell him they weren't allowed at the match.
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right
This season's Heineken Cup
Doing my napper in!
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15684
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
I think we should call for a public inquiry into this omnishambles.
Tis the Ulster way, after all.
Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.
After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.
Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.
LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?
Tis the Ulster way, after all.
Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.
After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.
Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.
LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
I read it too fast. In my defence nobody told me what speed to read it at.Cap'n Grumpy wrote:Pay attention buster -Dave wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:45 pmThey were allowed in.Big-al wrote:Photos on social media of a significant very vocal group of La Rochelle entourage at the stadium.Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:49 pm That is a disgrace - ROG giving instruction from the sidelines when he's not even meant to be in the stadium.
Hmmm, please tell me their travelling support weren’t allowed at the match?
He asked you to tell him they weren't allowed at the match.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15684
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
In future read things TWICE to avoid errors.Dave wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:20 pmI read it too fast. In my defence nobody told me what speed to read it at.Cap'n Grumpy wrote:Pay attention buster -Dave wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:45 pmThey were allowed in.Big-al wrote:Photos on social media of a significant very vocal group of La Rochelle entourage at the stadium.Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:49 pm That is a disgrace - ROG giving instruction from the sidelines when he's not even meant to be in the stadium.
Hmmm, please tell me their travelling support weren’t allowed at the match?
He asked you to tell him they weren't allowed at the match.
If you miss things first time around, there's always Dave ja Vu.
I thought that's what it's there for????
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Sack "The Dish".
Logan IN
Logan IN
Never wrestle with a pig. You end up covered in muck and the pig loves it.
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15684
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Pedantry alert, the dish only has one 'e' - it doesn't have an 'e' at the end.
But when you wrote "Logan IN", I knew you were either drunk or attempting humour to comfort us in our pain.
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Mid Down
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:02 pm I think we should call for a public inquiry into this omnishambles.
Tis the Ulster way, after all.
Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.
After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.
Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.
LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?
Very good. Sounds about right although lacking the detail of the legal costs and how much the lawyers make.
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Do I detect I trace of cynicism in that post Grumps?Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:02 pm I think we should call for a public inquiry into this omnishambles.
Tis the Ulster way, after all.
Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.
After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.
Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.
LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Four question marks!!!! You are very curious.Cap'n Grumpy wrote:In future read things TWICE to avoid errors.
If you miss things first time around, there's always Dave ja Vu.
I thought that's what it's there for????
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15684
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Apologies - I assumed that anyone from Norn Iron would know that costs and lawyers would amount to millions out of anything relating to law and/or public inquiries.for dog and ulcer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:48 pmCap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:02 pm I think we should call for a public inquiry into this omnishambles.
Tis the Ulster way, after all.
Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.
After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.
Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.
LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?
Very good. Sounds about right although lacking the detail of the legal costs and how much the lawyers make.
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15684
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
I'm not sure what you detect SU. I may have included a trace of cynicism, but can't be sure if that's what you detected or not.StandUp wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:52 pmDo I detect I trace of cynicism in that post Grumps?Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:02 pm I think we should call for a public inquiry into this omnishambles.
Tis the Ulster way, after all.
Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.
After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.
Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.
LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Mid Down
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Allegedly.Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 3:00 pmApologies - I assumed that anyone from Norn Iron would know that costs and lawyers would amount to millions out of anything relating to law and/or public inquiries.for dog and ulcer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:48 pmCap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:02 pm I think we should call for a public inquiry into this omnishambles.
Tis the Ulster way, after all.
Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.
After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.
Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.
LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?
Very good. Sounds about right although lacking the detail of the legal costs and how much the lawyers make.
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15684
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Next season's Heineken Cup
Not really - I just thought one was obliged to show repeats on Dave and Dave Ja Vu.
Wasn't sure how many repeats - although I'm pretty certain 3 ain't enough.
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right