The UAFC

Cockatrice wrote:

thecrouch wrote:I did a stupid thing and read the URSC bakebook again.

There is one clown on there who cheeses me off more than any other.

so did I one even criticised 1F for not knowing what he was talking about when it came to back-rows....

There is one lad who would get his SUFTUM pom-poms out if Ulster were battered 60-0 by Banbridge 3rds.

thecrouch wrote:

Cockatrice wrote:

thecrouch wrote:I did a stupid thing and read the URSC bakebook again.

There is one clown on there who cheeses me off more than any other.

so did I one even criticised 1F for not knowing what he was talking about when it came to back-rows....

There is one lad who would get his SUFTUM pom-poms out if Ulster were battered 60-0 by Banbridge 3rds.

Banbridge 5s would give Ulster a good game right now

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Let's get behind the URSC bakebook page come what may, like true fans. Stop being so negative, they're doing their best.

I'm glad I think that as it's exactly what I think.

It's always gratifying to think you're glad, when it's what you think.

Can we get behind them for a really big hug?

When do they fly back?
Is everyone flying back or are some now on leave to fly back later?
Was the Hond at the game on Saturday?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ wrote:When do they fly back?
Is everyone flying back or are some now on leave to fly back later?
Was the Hond at the game on Saturday?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

He was there.

Deraless wrote:Let's get behind the URSC bakebook page come what may, like true fans. Stop being so negative, they're doing their best.

I'm glad I think that as it's exactly what I think.

I'm easily confused at my age, I thought the buck eejits hung out on Ulster Ragby's bakebook, but it appears that either there is another asylum of loons on URSC bakebook, or there 2 factions of clart or are they one & the same people or indeed, the final option, confined to URSC?

Being a member of URSC (but not its bakebook) I am somewhat concerned in the most Grouchoesque way that I don't wish to be a member of any club that would have a man such as I, but more importantly, I feel association with the such a gang of gargoyles may damage my reputation as a serious rugby commentator...................

BaggyTrousers wrote:

Deraless wrote:Let's get behind the URSC bakebook page come what may, like true fans. Stop being so negative, they're doing their best.

I'm glad I think that as it's exactly what I think.

I'm easily confused at my age, I thought the buck eejits hung out on Ulster Ragby's bakebook, but it appears that either there is another asylum of loons on URSC bakebook, or there 2 factions of clart or are they one & the same people or indeed, the final option, confined to URSC?

Being a member of URSC (but not its bakebook) I am somewhat concerned in the most Grouchoesque way that I don't wish to be a member of any club that would have a man such as I, but more importantly, I feel association with the such a gang of gargoyles may damage my reputation as a serious rugby commentator...................

The URSC bakebook is a lot worse than the official Ulster bakebook.

You could do a nice weekly newsletter detailing the stupid posts made on the URSC bakebook.

For the sake of both yer sanity and yer swimmers, stay away from anything Bakebook related.
No good will ever come from it and anyone infected by it is generally unaware of the damage it is doing to the human race and our planet.
I cannot stress how important this message is. In laymen's terms, it would be less harmful to include Subway, Greggs and Domestos into you daily diet.

That's easy for me to do as I've no idea what Bakebook is.

Jebus Tender. You want to stay off the domestos. That stuff will put you clean round the bend!

I like the one debating why McBurney and Locan Dow are not getting game time, "oh he is injured and if not why is he not getting game time" when mentioned that he was in squad and came on the last 10 he stated , Oh, I had my fingers over my eyes as I could not watch the last 10 minutes , right go fûck off you lying piece of shít, obviously you never watched the game and are a Mr Knob. No one else cared to mention Dow got the chop last year, because they are morons.

Any way the sooner Ian Humphries is fit the better, great 12 and we miss him

Kofi Annan wrote:I like the one debating why McBurney and Locan Dow are not getting game time, "oh he is injured and if not why is he not getting game time" when mentioned that he was in squad and came on the last 10 he stated , Oh, I had my fingers over my eyes as I could not watch the last 10 minutes , right go fûck off you lying piece of shít, obviously you never watched the game and are a Mr Knob. No one else cared to mention Dow got the chop last year, because they are morons.

Any way the sooner Ian Humphries is fit the better, great 12 and we miss him

There was a bakebooker who slated everyone complaining about the Treviso performance a few weeks back. When asked if he actually watched the game, he stated that he did not because he was at the Giants.

which is worse the real one or the continuity one?

There is one who says a DoR should have a 5 year plan and a 5 year contract to achieve it. Then says Kiss is Sh!te, has taken us backwards over 3 years and Logan is a Tw@t and both need to go.

The irony may be lost on him but he got there in the end