Ulster sides in UBL

BaggyTrousers · Post by **BaggyTrousers** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:47 am

That's as may be 9 but I'd take Brian's record as the man in charge without batting an eyelid. FOLK

UR13IRFU · Post by **UR13IRFU** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:17 pm

When u look at what a mess Brian had to takeover from and the squad that he had Afoa and Ruan aside, he worked wonders that season. He got the players behind him and playing for him. His pro 12 record wasn't the best but they gave blood sweat and tears. Outstanding coach and would take him back at Ulster in a heartbeat.

Russ · Post by **Russ** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 9:56 pm

Banbridge 2s vs Armagh 1s

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:19 pm

Russ wrote:Banbridge 2s vs Armagh 1s

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Scared to send the firsts ?

Russ · Post by **Russ** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:26 pm

Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:Banbridge 2s vs Armagh 1s

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Scared to send the firsts ?

All playing for ulster a

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

UlsterNo9 · Post by **UlsterNo9** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:36 pm

UR13IRFU wrote:When u look at what a mess Brian had to takeover from and the squad that he had Afoa and Ruan aside, he worked wonders that season. He got the players behind him and playing for him. His pro 12 record wasn't the best but they gave blood sweat and tears. Outstanding coach and would take him back at Ulster in a heartbeat.

Best, Muller, Wannenburg. ... a fit Ferris. Strongest Ulster pack in decades.

BaggyTrousers · Post by **BaggyTrousers** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:47 am

UlsterNo9 wrote:
UR13IRFU wrote:When u look at what a mess Brian had to takeover from and the squad that he had Afoa and Ruan aside, he worked wonders that season. He got the players behind him and playing for him. His pro 12 record wasn't the best but they gave blood sweat and tears. Outstanding coach and would take him back at Ulster in a heartbeat.
Best, Muller, Wannenburg. ... a fit Ferris. Strongest Ulster pack in decades.

Neither Ferris nor Henry was fit for the final, but both played because much as that was an excellent pack, there was nothing behind the first choice players. As a matter of fact I doubt Stevie was ever properly fit again.

UlsterNo9 · Post by **UlsterNo9** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:02 pm

BaggyTrousers wrote:
UlsterNo9 wrote:
UR13IRFU wrote:When u look at what a mess Brian had to takeover from and the squad that he had Afoa and Ruan aside, he worked wonders that season. He got the players behind him and playing for him. His pro 12 record wasn't the best but they gave blood sweat and tears. Outstanding coach and would take him back at Ulster in a heartbeat.
Best, Muller, Wannenburg. ... a fit Ferris. Strongest Ulster pack in decades.
Neither Ferris nor Henry was fit for the final, but both played because much as that was an excellent pack, there was nothing behind the first choice players. As a matter of fact I doubt Stevie was ever properly fit again.

They say every boxer has one last fight, for 1F his was Munster away in that QF.

My point, he had a hell of a lot more than Afoa and Pienaar.

Russ · Post by **Russ** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 3:27 pm

Armagh leading 6-0 at half time
Lucky to say the least
Banbridge by far the superior side

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:40 pm

Russ wrote:Armagh leading 6-0 at half time
Lucky to say the least
Banbridge by far the superior side

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Who told you that, Banbridge rarely got out of their own 22 never mind half

Anyway finished up 16 - 6 and Banbridge gave the impression of a side that thought winning was just a formality. Armagh dominated scrum, stole a couple of lineouts and looked the sharper side all match, Banbridge had a couple of chances but their ball handling was even worse than Ulsters with dropped passes and passing to no one, their fitness levels were telling at the end that while Soper may be a good coach his lads were sucking air for the last 20 mins.
I had thought the match would be closer than that but the scoreline did not even do justice to the difference in sides.

Russ · Post by **Russ** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:43 pm

Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:Armagh leading 6-0 at half time
Lucky to say the least
Banbridge by far the superior side

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Who told you that, Banbridge rarely got out of their own 22 never mind half
Anyway finished up 16 - 6 and Banbridge gave the impression of a side that thought winning was just a formality. Armagh dominated scrum, stole a couple of lineouts and looked the sharper side all match, Banbridge had a couple of chances but their ball handling was even worse than Ulsters with dropped passes and passing to no one, their fitness levels were telling at the end that while Soper may be a good coach his lads were sucking air for the last 20 mins.
I had thought the match would be closer than that but the scoreline did not even do justice to the difference in sides.

Was there mate
Your summary is nonsense

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:53 pm

Russ wrote:
Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:Armagh leading 6-0 at half time
Lucky to say the least
Banbridge by far the superior side

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Who told you that, Banbridge rarely got out of their own 22 never mind half
Anyway finished up 16 - 6 and Banbridge gave the impression of a side that thought winning was just a formality. Armagh dominated scrum, stole a couple of lineouts and looked the sharper side all match, Banbridge had a couple of chances but their ball handling was even worse than Ulsters with dropped passes and passing to no one, their fitness levels were telling at the end that while Soper may be a good coach his lads were sucking air for the last 20 mins.
I had thought the match would be closer than that but the scoreline did not even do justice to the difference in sides.
Was there mate
Your summary is nonsense

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

You give your version then explaining the scrum penalties and scoreline.

Russ · Post by **Russ** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:55 pm

Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:
Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:Armagh leading 6-0 at half time
Lucky to say the least
Banbridge by far the superior side

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Who told you that, Banbridge rarely got out of their own 22 never mind half
Anyway finished up 16 - 6 and Banbridge gave the impression of a side that thought winning was just a formality. Armagh dominated scrum, stole a couple of lineouts and looked the sharper side all match, Banbridge had a couple of chances but their ball handling was even worse than Ulsters with dropped passes and passing to no one, their fitness levels were telling at the end that while Soper may be a good coach his lads were sucking air for the last 20 mins.
I had thought the match would be closer than that but the scoreline did not even do justice to the difference in sides.
Was there mate
Your summary is nonsense

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
You give your version then explaining the scrum penalties and scoreline.

Cheats

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Tighty · Post by **Tighty** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 5:00 pm

Russ wrote:
Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:Armagh leading 6-0 at half time
Lucky to say the least
Banbridge by far the superior side

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Who told you that, Banbridge rarely got out of their own 22 never mind half
Anyway finished up 16 - 6 and Banbridge gave the impression of a side that thought winning was just a formality. Armagh dominated scrum, stole a couple of lineouts and looked the sharper side all match, Banbridge had a couple of chances but their ball handling was even worse than Ulsters with dropped passes and passing to no one, their fitness levels were telling at the end that while Soper may be a good coach his lads were sucking air for the last 20 mins.
I had thought the match would be closer than that but the scoreline did not even do justice to the difference in sides.
Was there mate
Your summary is nonsense

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Well Russ, let's hear a detailed rebuttal of Rooster's nonsense summary rather than a meaningless 4 word throwaway dismissal !!

Russ · Post by **Russ** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 5:07 pm

Tighty wrote:
Russ wrote:
Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:Armagh leading 6-0 at half time
Lucky to say the least
Banbridge by far the superior side

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Who told you that, Banbridge rarely got out of their own 22 never mind half
Anyway finished up 16 - 6 and Banbridge gave the impression of a side that thought winning was just a formality. Armagh dominated scrum, stole a couple of lineouts and looked the sharper side all match, Banbridge had a couple of chances but their ball handling was even worse than Ulsters with dropped passes and passing to no one, their fitness levels were telling at the end that while Soper may be a good coach his lads were sucking air for the last 20 mins.
I had thought the match would be closer than that but the scoreline did not even do justice to the difference in sides.
Was there mate
Your summary is nonsense

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Well Russ, let's hear a detailed rebuttal of Rooster's nonsense summary rather than a meaningless 4 word throwaway dismissal !!

No

BBTID

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

The UAFC

Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL

Re: Ulster sides in UBL