jean valjean wrote:I see the bbc are re-running the trial tonight at 10.40. Wonder if they will get the verdict right.
Sent from my SM-T713 using Tapatalk
Why ?
Being a little facetious, but the very fact they mention the pj and olding trial in the trailer means people will equate this mock trial with the real thing. A pretty rotten thing to do irrespective of the outcome.
jean valjean wrote:I see the bbc are re-running the trial tonight at 10.40. Wonder if they will get the verdict right.
Sent from my SM-T713 using Tapatalk
Why ?
Being a little facetious, but the very fact they mention the pj and olding trial in the trailer means people will equate this mock trial with the real thing. A pretty rotten thing to do irrespective of the outcome.
Sent from my SM-T713 using Tapatalk
Have they got a slapper ?
“That made me feel very special and underlined to me that Ulster is more than a team, it is a community and a rugby family" Rory Best
BBC CNUNTS
What’s the point, scripted and a hand picked jury! Can be tilted what ever way you desire, pointless .
“For the liespotter who knows how to listen well, the random words, sounds, and phrases in a person's speech are never as random as they seem. They offer a clear sightline into the liar's psyche.”
To link that programme to the pj/ so trail is virtually libellous
The Claimant was never unconscious and the case was never a case of her word against their’s once the witness walked in.
To bring up the text messages was totally uncalled for because they were never evidence of rape but use by the prosecution as a form of character assassination .
And repeated as they were in that programme is to continue the assault .
Not saying the guys are knights in shining armour but never rapist which was the impression the prosecution wished to implant .
The Claimant also used the word sluts so how is their use of that word more offensive than hers .
Neither PJ or SO used the word slut in any text yet the programme continued the myth that they did .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Within this carapace of skepticism there lives an optimist
This is a TV drama at the end of the day, with factious characters and a factious jury!
The specialist witnesses are paid employees of the production company and the actors envolved have s script!
The sad fact is that spotlight in this instance was not the real world! It was a mock up of what maybe and has no significance of the trial of PJ & SO.
Will the general public get it?
Unfortunately not!
noun "Fan"
an enthusiastic devotee, follower, or admirer of a sport,
I'm Not an expert, not always right, I'm just enthusiastic....well most of the time!
To link that programme to the pj/ so trail is virtually libellous
The Claimant was never unconscious and the case was never a case of her word against their’s once the witness walked in.
To bring up the text messages was totally uncalled for because they were never evidence of rape but use by the prosecution as a form of character assassination .
And repeated as they were in that programme is to continue the assault .
Not saying the guys are knights in shining armour but never rapist which was the impression the prosecution wished to implant .
The Claimant also used the word sluts so how is their use of that word more offensive than hers .
Neither PJ or SO used the word slut in any text yet the programme continued the myth that they did .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're on the money there Rum. F@cking joke of a programme, Daily Sport television. To use some of the facts and cr@p from the court case but then manipulate it to suit their own agenda is a disgrace for the FBBC. A new low, i hope and trust they will get more than a few letters of complaint. Dangerous TV, the kind of thing you would expect from Trump's camp.