Tender wrote:They were found not guilty of the whole incident. Sex between consenting adults isn’t illegal. Just because some weirdos only have sex to reproduce and they keep a sheet with a strategically placed hole cut in it, between their bodies, doesn’t mean those of us who actually enjoy sex in all its forms and permutations are holding themselves up for judgement. Paddy and Stuart weren’t re-enacting Gilbert Gottfried’s version of The Aristocrats joke. They had a fairly tame consensual threesome and if that offends anyone, then IMO those people can go and feck themselves.
... they were reasonable in their belief that they were having a fairly tame consensual threesome ...
Well, I suppose if a young lady has noshed at least 4 kidney wipers on an evening out, you cannot assume, but could be forgiven for thinking she was fond of an ould rub of the relic.
I rather admire their restraint in not having penetrative sex, using Fagan & the Magee twins, in the absence of a condom, now that I believe is the behaviour you should expect from a role model.
NEVER MOVE ON. Years on, I cannot ever watch Ireland with anything but indifference, I continue to wish for the imminent death of Donal Spring, the FIRFUC's executioner of Wee Paddy & Wee Stu, and I hate the FIRFUCs with undiminished passion.
It’s only a matter of time until the media realise what great restraint and Gentlemanly conduct the Top Shaggers showed during their dealings with the sexual predator.
Their respect for feminine rights is self evident. Little paddy didn’t get to play trains and tunnels because he couldn’t find a raincoat .
Support the Team, not the regime Guinness is Good For You.
stickinout wrote:Did any of you see the 42.ie website? I wonder if the complainant was a reader?
Check out "when it comes to rape, I think we're still obsessed with woman"
It's an article about a book from a while ago....
42 ie loves the clicks
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Aye, that may be Russ. But just check out the storyline of the book. Remind you of anything? I would've linked the web page in but not very used to this I paddy contraption.
breakdown wrote:Lets not forget there will not really be any TV audience next year aside from maybe the European games, assuming not many are going to pay for Premier sports or whatever its called, he can just hide behind that
Why do you think the sponsors really caused a fuss?
They wanted out
They used this situation to get out
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
What confuses me about this analysis Russ is that if BoI were really looking for an excuse to exit from their expensive sponsorship of a league that's about to go off mainstream TV then they failed. Surely their better tactic was to sit back quietly and hope that the IRFU kept the two boys on then use that as their public excuse to pull out. Did the IRFU outwit them?
breakdown wrote:Lets not forget there will not really be any TV audience next year aside from maybe the European games, assuming not many are going to pay for Premier sports or whatever its called, he can just hide behind that
Why do you think the sponsors really caused a fuss?
They wanted out
They used this situation to get out
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
What confuses me about this analysis Russ is that if BoI were really looking for an excuse to exit from their expensive sponsorship of a league that's about to go off mainstream TV then they failed. Surely their better tactic was to sit back quietly and hope that the IRFU kept the two boys on then use that as their public excuse to pull out. Did the IRFU outwit them?
breakdown wrote:Lets not forget there will not really be any TV audience next year aside from maybe the European games, assuming not many are going to pay for Premier sports or whatever its called, he can just hide behind that
Why do you think the sponsors really caused a fuss?
They wanted out
They used this situation to get out
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
What confuses me about this analysis Russ is that if BoI were really looking for an excuse to exit from their expensive sponsorship of a league that's about to go off mainstream TV then they failed. Surely their better tactic was to sit back quietly and hope that the IRFU kept the two boys on then use that as their public excuse to pull out. Did the IRFU outwit them?
Yes
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I'm not disagreeing btw. But if that's how it really went then the two boys were effectively collateral damage in a failed unethical attempt by the BoI to escape from a contract by appearing ethical. Even more shameful. It would appear you'd have to dig a very deep pit to reach the high moral ground they stand on.
breakdown wrote:Lets not forget there will not really be any TV audience next year aside from maybe the European games, assuming not many are going to pay for Premier sports or whatever its called, he can just hide behind that
Why do you think the sponsors really caused a fuss?
They wanted out
They used this situation to get out
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
What confuses me about this analysis Russ is that if BoI were really looking for an excuse to exit from their expensive sponsorship of a league that's about to go off mainstream TV then they failed. Surely their better tactic was to sit back quietly and hope that the IRFU kept the two boys on then use that as their public excuse to pull out. Did the IRFU outwit them?
Thank you Paul
I don't think BofI want out of their sponsorship deal at all.
