Page 35 of 244

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:47 pm
by Tender
Sorry Snipe, I apologise. It was a warmed up recap of yesterday’s dirge.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:01 pm
by Snipe Watson
BaggyTrousers wrote:I know of at least two things that have been withheld, I assume there may be more but of course, not for discussion here.
Some issues were ruled inadmissible by the judge. Or so I'm told.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:16 pm
by BaggyTrousers
Snipe Watson wrote:
Tender wrote:Read today’s proceedings Snipe. It’s all there.

Back in time for Sprays game.
There were to be no proceedings today :scratch:
That's what I thought Snipe, unless legal argument has been disclosed, WTF knows.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:55 pm
by BR
Snipe Watson wrote:
BR wrote: He may be specialised in rape, exposure and perverting cases, but unless he's done work here, he'll not have done Witholding* before.

*I believe England now does have a law on Witholding, but it only applies to specific crimes against weens.
What was "supposedly" withheld? I clearly missed that part.
'witholding information' of a crime. Aka not being a tout.

I admit to being guilty myself. I saw a car on the M1 this morning with a defective break light.

In the case of Harrison, the implication is that he knew a rape had been committed, but failed to report it to the police.

Completely separate from attempting to pervert the course of justice. And a lot less serious.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:00 pm
by Deraless
Police: Don't speculate in your statement, just answer the questions accurately.

RH does as asked, so Headjob goes off on one about verbal fencing, not speculating and only answering the questions he was asked but not all the ones he wasn't asked.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:04 pm
by Snipe Watson
BR wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:
BR wrote: He may be specialised in rape, exposure and perverting cases, but unless he's done work here, he'll not have done Witholding* before.

*I believe England now does have a law on Witholding, but it only applies to specific crimes against weens.
What was "supposedly" withheld? I clearly missed that part.
'witholding information' of a crime. Aka not being a tout.

I admit to being guilty myself. I saw a car on the M1 this morning with a defective break light.

In the case of Harrison, the implication is that he knew a rape had been committed, but failed to report it to the police.

Completely separate from attempting to pervert the course of justice. And a lot less serious.
Cheers :salut: I wouldn't have had a Scooby Doo about that. But I'm paid less than Hedworth.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:23 pm
by BR
Snipe Watson wrote:
BR wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:
BR wrote: He may be specialised in rape, exposure and perverting cases, but unless he's done work here, he'll not have done Witholding* before.

*I believe England now does have a law on Witholding, but it only applies to specific crimes against weens.
What was "supposedly" withheld? I clearly missed that part.
'witholding information' of a crime. Aka not being a tout.

I admit to being guilty myself. I saw a car on the M1 this morning with a defective break light.

In the case of Harrison, the implication is that he knew a rape had been committed, but failed to report it to the police.

Completely separate from attempting to pervert the course of justice. And a lot less serious.
Cheers :salut: I wouldn't have had a Scooby Doo about that. But I'm paid less than Hedworth.
Not a particularly well known crime (let's face it we tend to receive most of our legal knowledge from the Big Island), but one with a chequered past here, as you can imagine.

Also interesting in that it can cause problems for certain professions (doctors, clergy, etc) who in GB could be expected to maintain client confidentiality. Could end up charged here.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 10:35 pm
by Cornerfleg
Snipe Watson wrote:
BaggyTrousers wrote:I know of at least two things that have been withheld, I assume there may be more but of course, not for discussion here.
Some issues were ruled inadmissible by the judge. Or so I'm told.
We never did get to hear Paddy's favourite colour... Or who he voted for in the great British menu....

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:33 am
by Kofi Annan
Purple and he loves a good Eclair

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:06 pm
by BaggyTrousers
FFFS, jury sent home again, another "legal matter has arisen". Will this pantomime ever close?

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:18 pm
by nonplussed
Defence evidently still pushing to get it thrown out


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:44 pm
by Russ
nonplussed wrote:Defence evidently still pushing to get it thrown out


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Possibility of a few jurors being thrown out
Very hard to stay away from the meedya

Possibility of a mistrial given the absolute clusterfeck of the prosecution

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 3:15 pm
by Deraless
BaggyTrousers wrote:FFFS, jury sent home again, another "legal matter has arisen". Will this pantomime ever close?
It might be a good thing

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 3:55 pm
by Dave
Mistrial would mean that a case could be brought again?

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 5:03 pm
by Russ
Dave wrote:Mistrial would mean that a case could be brought again?
Depends

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk