Re: Replacement 10
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:47 pm
Sorry Snipe, I apologise. It was a warmed up recap of yesterday’s dirge.
The Ulternative Alster Fan Club supporting Ulster Rugby!
https://www.uafc.co.uk/
Some issues were ruled inadmissible by the judge. Or so I'm told.BaggyTrousers wrote:I know of at least two things that have been withheld, I assume there may be more but of course, not for discussion here.
That's what I thought Snipe, unless legal argument has been disclosed, WTF knows.Snipe Watson wrote:There were to be no proceedings todayTender wrote:Read today’s proceedings Snipe. It’s all there.
Back in time for Sprays game.
'witholding information' of a crime. Aka not being a tout.Snipe Watson wrote:What was "supposedly" withheld? I clearly missed that part.BR wrote: He may be specialised in rape, exposure and perverting cases, but unless he's done work here, he'll not have done Witholding* before.
*I believe England now does have a law on Witholding, but it only applies to specific crimes against weens.
Cheers I wouldn't have had a Scooby Doo about that. But I'm paid less than Hedworth.BR wrote:'witholding information' of a crime. Aka not being a tout.Snipe Watson wrote:What was "supposedly" withheld? I clearly missed that part.BR wrote: He may be specialised in rape, exposure and perverting cases, but unless he's done work here, he'll not have done Witholding* before.
*I believe England now does have a law on Witholding, but it only applies to specific crimes against weens.
I admit to being guilty myself. I saw a car on the M1 this morning with a defective break light.
In the case of Harrison, the implication is that he knew a rape had been committed, but failed to report it to the police.
Completely separate from attempting to pervert the course of justice. And a lot less serious.
Not a particularly well known crime (let's face it we tend to receive most of our legal knowledge from the Big Island), but one with a chequered past here, as you can imagine.Snipe Watson wrote:Cheers I wouldn't have had a Scooby Doo about that. But I'm paid less than Hedworth.BR wrote:'witholding information' of a crime. Aka not being a tout.Snipe Watson wrote:What was "supposedly" withheld? I clearly missed that part.BR wrote: He may be specialised in rape, exposure and perverting cases, but unless he's done work here, he'll not have done Witholding* before.
*I believe England now does have a law on Witholding, but it only applies to specific crimes against weens.
I admit to being guilty myself. I saw a car on the M1 this morning with a defective break light.
In the case of Harrison, the implication is that he knew a rape had been committed, but failed to report it to the police.
Completely separate from attempting to pervert the course of justice. And a lot less serious.
We never did get to hear Paddy's favourite colour... Or who he voted for in the great British menu....Snipe Watson wrote:Some issues were ruled inadmissible by the judge. Or so I'm told.BaggyTrousers wrote:I know of at least two things that have been withheld, I assume there may be more but of course, not for discussion here.
Possibility of a few jurors being thrown outnonplussed wrote:Defence evidently still pushing to get it thrown out
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It might be a good thingBaggyTrousers wrote:FFFS, jury sent home again, another "legal matter has arisen". Will this pantomime ever close?
DependsDave wrote:Mistrial would mean that a case could be brought again?