Page 33 of 244

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 8:58 pm
by Rooster
ColinM wrote:
Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:
Rooster wrote:
Russ wrote:This is a legal issue


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
It's a very serious issue as there is no Guinness here in the bar
You're a fecking liar

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I'm not a feckin liar, there is no Guinness in this bar
It is the case that you gave fabricated this work of fiction and you have no idea how preposterous it sounds

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
I'm not lying, this bar has no Guinness and no Bushmills either, it is a terrible place.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:46 pm
by Lurgan Lad
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk[/quote]
No. A big boy did it and ran away after the dog ate Rooster's homework.[/quote]That homework was deleted from your computer

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk[/quote]
We just panicked when we saw the big dog and threw the homework at him.[/quote]This is a legal issue


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk[/quote]It's a very serious issue as there is no Guinness here in the bar[/quote]You're a fecking liar

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk[/quote]I'm not a feckin liar, there is no Guinness in this bar[/quote]It is the case that you gave fabricated this work of fiction and you have no idea how preposterous it sounds

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk[/quote]I'm not lying, this bar has no Guinness and no Bushmills either, it is a terrible place.[/quote]
I put it to you Rooster that you aren't in a bar

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:19 am
by Tender
I put it to you Rooster, that the bar in question is indeed the type of establishment which indeed may sometimes be referred to by certain upwardly mobile types as a’Bar’ but that by putting the word Barista in front of the word Bar, does not in fact constitute an actual Bar in the common usage of the term, as in general parlance a Bar is an establishment where discerning persons, and I preclude no gender from this statement, go to get sh1tfaced.

Legal Aid speak for ... It’s a Coffee Bar

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:12 pm
by Rooster
Tender wrote:I put it to you Rooster, that the bar in question is indeed the type of establishment which indeed may sometimes be referred to by certain upwardly mobile types as a’Bar’ but that by putting the word Barista in front of the word Bar, does not in fact constitute an actual Bar in the common usage of the term, as in general parlance a Bar is an establishment where discerning persons, and I preclude no gender from this statement, go to get sh1tfaced.

Legal Aid speak for ... It’s a Coffee Bar
No 4 types draught lager about a dozen bottled stuff, usual row of optics with gin, vodka, whisky, whiskey, etc etc but no feckin Bushmills or Guinness.
It was terrible but I survived.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:51 pm
by Kofi Annan
Toby Hedworth QC, why bring in a prosecutor from england !

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:04 pm
by Rooster
Kofi Annan wrote:Toby Hedworth QC, why bring in a prosecutor from england !
Cheaper than one from here, then of course add on travel expenses etc and he probably costs twice as much but sure who cares.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:37 pm
by Deraless
He comes across as a buffoon.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:50 pm
by BR
Kofi Annan wrote:Toby Hedworth QC, why bring in a prosecutor from england !
Is he even familiar with 'Witholding Information'? Sure that isn't even an offence in England.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:56 pm
by Dave
Blocking local talent

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:26 pm
by Rooster
BR wrote:
Kofi Annan wrote:Toby Hedworth QC, why bring in a prosecutor from england !
Is he even familiar with 'Witholding Information'? Sure that isn't even an offence in England.
Just wondering, is he qualified to work in NI ?

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:30 pm
by Dave
Rooster wrote:
BR wrote:
Kofi Annan wrote:Toby Hedworth QC, why bring in a prosecutor from england !
Is he even familiar with 'Witholding Information'? Sure that isn't even an offence in England.
Just wondering, is he qualified to work in NI ?
A lot of english legal types trained in NI specific law as the legal aid paid out here was a higher rate compared to England.

#classicNI

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:39 pm
by Cornerfleg
I think I wanted to say no comment ... but it might have been the alcohol ... I just cant remember.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:40 pm
by Rooster
Dave wrote:
Rooster wrote:
BR wrote:
Kofi Annan wrote:Toby Hedworth QC, why bring in a prosecutor from england !
Is he even familiar with 'Witholding Information'? Sure that isn't even an offence in England.
Just wondering, is he qualified to work in NI ?
A lot of english legal types trained in NI specific law as the legal aid paid out here was a higher rate compared to England.

#classicNI
Checked him out and he can work here, mind you the way some other aspects have been conducted I wouldn't have been surprised if he hadn't been qualified to work here :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:42 pm
by Cornerfleg
Did Nuci not step in and make sure there were local IQ QC's in the fast lane.

Re: Replacement 10

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:43 pm
by ColinM
It's a very high profile case here, not so much in GB. Wonder is that a factor in a non NI prosecutor

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk