Replacement 10

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

prawnsarnies
Novice
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by prawnsarnies »

Tender wrote:If only they’d been found guilty of doing something illegal, like snorting coke for example...
Which we know the D4 brigade were up to their armpits in back in the day.
"You have to find to find your own solace - your own drive, your own ambition, your own inner strength; for the greatest game of your f**king life." Jim Telfer, 1st Test, Lions Tour 1997
User avatar
BR
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 18579
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:12 am
Location: On a roll.

Re: Replacement 10

Post by BR »

prawnsarnies wrote:
Rooster wrote:
MightyRearranger wrote:
BR wrote:
prawnsarnies wrote:What boils my p!sh is the fact that none of these ex players will come out and say that they think it's ridiculous.
McBride.
There were a few familiar names on the petition to have them reinstated too.
Most of the squad and their families plus a few ex squad members as well
I meant the wider rugby community more than those with Ulster affiliations.

Why couldn't one of them even say "ah well there's a few things on my phone I wouldn't want plastered across the papers". Even tongue in cheek.

Vanilla, media coached, non opinions from all. Sad state of affairs.
I suspect, by and large those outside the bubble of Irish rugby, even current players, were not that aware of what was happening.
Can I come out from behind the sofa yet?
www.stoutboys.co.uk
Cockatrice
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 8235
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:06 am

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Cockatrice »

ColinM wrote:
BR wrote: I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.
Their sponsors might
Adadias don’t seem to give a feck what Paddy did..
Currently studying Stage 5 (level3) at IRFU
Cockatrice
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 8235
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:06 am

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Cockatrice »

The sooner the bouncer has his story dragged thru the press the better for everyone..
Currently studying Stage 5 (level3) at IRFU
Deraless
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:26 am

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Deraless »

Cockatrice wrote:The sooner the bouncer has his story dragged thru the press the better for everyone..
Which bouncer?
Which establishment?
Which night?

Why limit things.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Never wrestle with a pig. You end up covered in muck and the pig loves it.
ulster32
Novice
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:36 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by ulster32 »

What’s the bouncers story?
User avatar
BR
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 18579
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:12 am
Location: On a roll.

Re: Replacement 10

Post by BR »

Cockatrice wrote:The sooner the bouncer has his story dragged thru the press the better for everyone..
Of public interest? Perhaps.
In the public interest? Doubtful.
Can I come out from behind the sofa yet?
www.stoutboys.co.uk
User avatar
ColinM
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7858
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:11 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by ColinM »

BR wrote:
ColinM wrote:
BR wrote: I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.
Their sponsors might
Nope - nobody looking in on this from the outside will even notice. 2 things will matter
1. Innocence.
2. Wider public perception.

We've been looking at this through a microscope for too long.
So PJ is an international standard out half without an offer of employment. Clubs (and sponsors allegedly) are currently unwilling to take a punt on going against public perception. We don't know how straightforward a decision that has been to potentially interested parties

If PJs costs were awarded who are we to know that is not enough for a club (and it's sponsors) to take the risk of signing him?

All signings are risky business, I'm not sure any of us, microscope or not can equivocally state this wont make a difference in that risk analysis

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
User avatar
UlsterNo9
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5725
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by UlsterNo9 »

ColinM wrote:
BR wrote:
ColinM wrote:
BR wrote: I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.
Their sponsors might
Nope - nobody looking in on this from the outside will even notice. 2 things will matter
1. Innocence.
2. Wider public perception.

We've been looking at this through a microscope for too long.
So PJ is an international standard out half without an offer of employment. Clubs (and sponsors allegedly) are currently unwilling to take a punt on going against public perception. We don't know how straightforward a decision that has been to potentially interested parties

If PJs costs were awarded who are we to know that is not enough for a club (and it's sponsors) to take the risk of signing him?

All signings are risky business, I'm not sure any of us, microscope or not can equivocally state this wont make a difference in that risk analysis

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
PJ will be signed and playing rugby for a pro team come the start of next season, as will Olding.
BRING OUR BOYS HOME #BOBH
THROWN UNDER THE BUS AND EXILED 14/04/18
Cockatrice
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 8235
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:06 am

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Cockatrice »

UlsterNo9 wrote:
ColinM wrote:
BR wrote:
ColinM wrote:
BR wrote: I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.
Their sponsors might
Nope - nobody looking in on this from the outside will even notice. 2 things will matter
1. Innocence.
2. Wider public perception.

We've been looking at this through a microscope for too long.
So PJ is an international standard out half without an offer of employment. Clubs (and sponsors allegedly) are currently unwilling to take a punt on going against public perception. We don't know how straightforward a decision that has been to potentially interested parties

If PJs costs were awarded who are we to know that is not enough for a club (and it's sponsors) to take the risk of signing him?

All signings are risky business, I'm not sure any of us, microscope or not can equivocally state this wont make a difference in that risk analysis

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
PJ will be signed and playing rugby for a pro team come the start of next season, as will Olding.
Yes they will be playing and PJ already seems to advertisIng one of the worlds leading brands so they clearly feel different to BoI..
Currently studying Stage 5 (level3) at IRFU
User avatar
Gael
Steward
Posts: 808
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:40 pm
Location: Festival State

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Gael »

I don't think the lads will play again I'm afraid.

Sponsors don't care about their innocence, just the twitter rage that will come from signing them.
There was never a guard nor a customs man, got his nose inside that transit van.
User avatar
Dave
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 24601
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Dave »

The reporting in the english press was worse than here. This was the opening paragraph in the telegraph when the lads were sacked.

'Campaigners against sexual violence have applauded the sackings by Ireland and Ulster of Paddy Jackson and Stuart Olding, amid the acrimonious fallout to the players’ rape trial.' 
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
rumncoke
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7888
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:39 pm

Replacement 10

Post by rumncoke »

Dave

When was it written on the day after ?

Written in ignorance of the facts the English press hardly touch the trial until after the verdict .

And because of the IRFU action assumed there was just cause — « violence against women »
What violence ?the piece you have quoted is damned near slander by inference .

Fact - they were never going to be signed up immediately after the decision —

The Harpies will soon find another male to sacrifice for the benefit of the sisterhood .

The bouncers story is of no consequence — what their rant was based on the two messages in WhatsApp .

In six months the fact that 3 girls were unafraid and unmolested will be better understood and her lies become more obvious .

In the light of that understanding the messages become immature banter and unimportant .
Because she will be seen as the instigator —which she was — she went uninvited to his house - she went uninvited into his bed room twice .

It was never a case of she was asking for it — she started it and ended it .

And as time goes by that conclusion becomes more obvious in the silence of Twitter .

Of course in six months time when it is announced that someone has signed them a few voices will
Question the decision but it will never again be in the hundreds or thousands with its own # twitter account for slanders hide in .









Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by rumncoke on Fri May 25, 2018 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Within this carapace of skepticism there lives an optimist
User avatar
Russ
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 28295
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: Looking for George North's defence

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Russ »

Given early polling it could be a great weekend to bring back Paddy

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
User avatar
Rooster
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 40137
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 12:39 am
Location: Chicken coop 17

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Rooster »

Russ wrote:Given early polling it could be a great weekend to bring back Paddy

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
They wouldn't notice he had returned
“That made me feel very special and underlined to me that Ulster is more than a team, it is a community and a rugby family"
Rory Best
Post Reply