It would be hard to say he didn't know about it though.ColinM wrote:Maybe that is part of waiting for the dust to settleDave wrote:Court was informed he had no offer of employment.
Replacement 10
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Replacement 10
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
Re: Replacement 10
McBride.prawnsarnies wrote:What boils my p!sh is the fact that none of these ex players will come out and say that they think it's ridiculous.
- MightyRearranger
- Warrior
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 2:42 am
- Location: Lisburn
Re: Replacement 10
There were a few familiar names on the petition to have them reinstated too.BR wrote:McBride.prawnsarnies wrote:What boils my p!sh is the fact that none of these ex players will come out and say that they think it's ridiculous.
Re: Replacement 10
Most of the squad and their families plus a few ex squad members as wellMightyRearranger wrote:There were a few familiar names on the petition to have them reinstated too.BR wrote:McBride.prawnsarnies wrote:What boils my p!sh is the fact that none of these ex players will come out and say that they think it's ridiculous.
“That made me feel very special and underlined to me that Ulster is more than a team, it is a community and a rugby family"
Rory Best
Rory Best
Re: Replacement 10
Dave wrote:It would be hard to say he didn't know about it though.ColinM wrote:Maybe that is part of waiting for the dust to settleDave wrote:Court was informed he had no offer of employment.
They could agree to speak again after the ruling and point to the press articles. If PJ is awarded his costs it is a big boost to his employability as it is confirmation of what we all believe.
Re: Replacement 10
AgreedColinM wrote:Dave wrote:It would be hard to say he didn't know about it though.ColinM wrote:Maybe that is part of waiting for the dust to settleDave wrote:Court was informed he had no offer of employment.
They could agree to speak again after the ruling and point to the press articles. If PJ is awarded his costs it is a big boost to his employability as it is confirmation of what we all believe.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
Re: Replacement 10
I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.Dave wrote:AgreedColinM wrote:Dave wrote:It would be hard to say he didn't know about it though.ColinM wrote:Maybe that is part of waiting for the dust to settleDave wrote:Court was informed he had no offer of employment.
They could agree to speak again after the ruling and point to the press articles. If PJ is awarded his costs it is a big boost to his employability as it is confirmation of what we all believe.
Re: Replacement 10
Their sponsors mightBR wrote: I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.
Re: Replacement 10
Nope - nobody looking in on this from the outside will even notice. 2 things will matterColinM wrote:Their sponsors mightBR wrote: I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.
1. Innocence.
2. Wider public perception.
We've been looking at this through a microscope for too long.
Re: Replacement 10
Main sponsor and owner give no fecks about their problems in the past, not guilty was their go ahead.ColinM wrote:Their sponsors mightBR wrote: I doubt his prospective employers give a fck about the nuances of his legal status.
“That made me feel very special and underlined to me that Ulster is more than a team, it is a community and a rugby family"
Rory Best
Rory Best
- shamalicious
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 5379
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:32 am
Re: Replacement 10
No doubt current squad members have been banned from giving personal opinions about the matter.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Nevin Spence 26 April 1990 – 15 September 2012 gone but never forgotten
-
- Chancellor to the King
- Posts: 3092
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:03 pm
Re: Replacement 10
Paddy should do an primetime slot with nolan or Oprah like lance did. Without a confession though.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Re: Replacement 10
Correct.shamalicious wrote:No doubt current squad members have been banned from giving personal opinions about the matter.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
Re: Replacement 10
If only they’d been found guilty of doing something illegal, like snorting coke for example...
They’d have been back playing after a two month ban!
Feck I hate Aussies.
Once a jolly swagman, sniffed snatter snow up his hooter.
They’d have been back playing after a two month ban!
Feck I hate Aussies.
Once a jolly swagman, sniffed snatter snow up his hooter.
Support the Team, not the regime
Guinness is Good For You.
Guinness is Good For You.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Replacement 10
I meant the wider rugby community more than those with Ulster affiliations.Rooster wrote:Most of the squad and their families plus a few ex squad members as wellMightyRearranger wrote:There were a few familiar names on the petition to have them reinstated too.BR wrote:McBride.prawnsarnies wrote:What boils my p!sh is the fact that none of these ex players will come out and say that they think it's ridiculous.
Why couldn't one of them even say "ah well there's a few things on my phone I wouldn't want plastered across the papers". Even tongue in cheek.
Vanilla, media coached, non opinions from all. Sad state of affairs.
"You have to find to find your own solace - your own drive, your own ambition, your own inner strength; for the greatest game of your f**king life." Jim Telfer, 1st Test, Lions Tour 1997