Replacement 10

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Deraless
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:26 am

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Deraless »

Snipe Watson wrote:If the accused were not in the public eye, this would never have seen the inside of a court.

The PPS were scared of being accused of going easy on celebs.
Is one of a couple of explanations.

Which makes the BBC leaking the story even more significant though.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Never wrestle with a pig. You end up covered in muck and the pig loves it.
Top
rumncoke
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:39 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by rumncoke »

The moral of the tale is don’t use “social apps” like facebake Twatter or who’supwho your indiscretions May be held against her !!!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Within this carapace of skepticism there lives an optimist
Top
Deraless
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:26 am

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Deraless »

Cornerfleg wrote:Rodney woke up with a KFC bargain bucket in his mouth.... He had no idea how it got there.
I'd imagine a couple of days later he will try to convince the s&c guys that someone forced it into him.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Never wrestle with a pig. You end up covered in muck and the pig loves it.
Top
User avatar
Russ
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 28295
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: Looking for George North's defence

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Russ »

damianmcr wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:If the accused were not in the public eye, this would never have seen the inside of a court.

The PPS were scared of being accused of going easy on celebs.
I agree with this. I dont have a clue how anyone could find the pair guilty right now.

Do the defence call witnesses now and then the prosecution can cross examine?
Supposedly yes
The defence could just rest on Monday

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Top
User avatar
Jackie Brown
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 11723
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Carrickfergus

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Jackie Brown »

Russ wrote:
damianmcr wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:If the accused were not in the public eye, this would never have seen the inside of a court.

The PPS were scared of being accused of going easy on celebs.
I agree with this. I dont have a clue how anyone could find the pair guilty right now.

Do the defence call witnesses now and then the prosecution can cross examine?
Supposedly yes
The defence could just rest on Monday

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Or the judge could knock it on the head.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Gonna Party Like It's 1999
Top
User avatar
Snipe Watson
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 23443
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:42 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Snipe Watson »

Gerald the Mole wrote:Some serious questions have to be asked to the PPS and PSNI, shambolic investigation and did the English prosecution team have anyone over in England for some coaching.
Coach should be sacked.
Top
Deraless
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:26 am

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Deraless »

Gerald the Mole wrote:Some serious questions have to be asked to the PPS and PSNI, shambolic investigation and did the English prosecution team have anyone over in England for some coaching.
#FOPPS

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Never wrestle with a pig. You end up covered in muck and the pig loves it.
Top
User avatar
Russ
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 28295
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: Looking for George North's defence

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Russ »

Jackie Brown wrote:
Russ wrote:
damianmcr wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:If the accused were not in the public eye, this would never have seen the inside of a court.

The PPS were scared of being accused of going easy on celebs.
I agree with this. I dont have a clue how anyone could find the pair guilty right now.

Do the defence call witnesses now and then the prosecution can cross examine?
Supposedly yes
The defence could just rest on Monday

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Or the judge could knock it on the head.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
She tried to do that twice already I believe

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Top
User avatar
Snipe Watson
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 23443
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:42 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Snipe Watson »

Jackie Brown wrote:
Russ wrote:
damianmcr wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:If the accused were not in the public eye, this would never have seen the inside of a court.

The PPS were scared of being accused of going easy on celebs.
I agree with this. I dont have a clue how anyone could find the pair guilty right now.

Do the defence call witnesses now and then the prosecution can cross examine?
Supposedly yes
The defence could just rest on Monday

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Or the judge could knock it on the head.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
There is no evidence being heard tomorrow. It seems "the court will deal with legal matters" :scratch:
Here was me thinking the whole case was a legal matter.
Or will they discuss the catastrophic performance of the prosecution and polis?
Top
User avatar
Snipe Watson
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 23443
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:42 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Snipe Watson »

Russ wrote:
Jackie Brown wrote:Or the judge could knock it on the head.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
She tried to do that twice already I believe

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
If she says it's over, surely it's over?
Top
User avatar
BaggyTrousers
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 30337
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:29 pm
Location: España

Re: Replacement 10

Post by BaggyTrousers »

Gerald the Mole wrote:Some serious questions have to be asked to the PPS and PSNI, shambolic investigation and did the English prosecution team have anyone over in England for some coaching.
There's a thing, Ger. Certainly well prepared.

I have to say that many years ago when I was getting a fabulous blowjob, the young lady seemed to slacken her efforts so I had to hold her head. I was almost 100% confident that had I not she would have stopped, not through any reluctance of course, maybe just an aching jaw, frankly I'd rather have relaxed with my hands on my thighs ................................ just saying like, seems logical to me. Anyway enough of my sex life, and I'm certainly not going to discuss the current case that appears to be making a splash in the news.
NEVER MOVE ON. Years on, I cannot ever watch Ireland with anything but indifference, I continue to wish for the imminent death of Donal Spring, the FIRFUC's executioner of Wee Paddy & Wee Stu, and I hate the FIRFUCs with undiminished passion.
Top
User avatar
Rooster
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 40137
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 12:39 am
Location: Chicken coop 17

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Rooster »

Cornerfleg wrote:Rodney woke up with a KFC bargain bucket in his mouth.... He had no idea how it got there.
No doubt the bucket was empty though :lol: :lol: :lol: feck he must have been hungry if he was eating the bucket as well :shock:
“That made me feel very special and underlined to me that Ulster is more than a team, it is a community and a rugby family"
Rory Best
Top
User avatar
ColinM
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7858
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:11 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by ColinM »

Snipe Watson wrote:
Jackie Brown wrote:
Russ wrote:
damianmcr wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:If the accused were not in the public eye, this would never have seen the inside of a court.

The PPS were scared of being accused of going easy on celebs.
I agree with this. I dont have a clue how anyone could find the pair guilty right now.

Do the defence call witnesses now and then the prosecution can cross examine?
Supposedly yes
The defence could just rest on Monday

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Or the judge could knock it on the head.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
There is no evidence being heard tomorrow. It seems "the court will deal with legal matters" :scratch:
Here was me thinking the whole case was a legal matter.
Or will they discuss the catastrophic performance of the prosecution and polis?
Was wondering if the defence have spotted something procedurally not correct in the prosecution case which they intend to debate tomorrow, something significant enough to quash any guilty verdict?

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
Top
User avatar
Jackie Brown
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 11723
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Carrickfergus

Re: Replacement 10

Post by Jackie Brown »

ColinM wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:
Jackie Brown wrote:
Russ wrote:
damianmcr wrote: I agree with this. I dont have a clue how anyone could find the pair guilty right now.

Do the defence call witnesses now and then the prosecution can cross examine?
Supposedly yes
The defence could just rest on Monday

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Or the judge could knock it on the head.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
There is no evidence being heard tomorrow. It seems "the court will deal with legal matters" :scratch:
Here was me thinking the whole case was a legal matter.
Or will they discuss the catastrophic performance of the prosecution and polis?
Was wondering if the defence have spotted something procedurally not correct in the prosecution case which they intend to debate tomorrow, something significant enough to quash any guilty verdict?

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
Like the lack of evidence?

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Gonna Party Like It's 1999
Top
User avatar
ColinM
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7858
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:11 pm

Re: Replacement 10

Post by ColinM »

Jackie Brown wrote:
ColinM wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:
Jackie Brown wrote:
Russ wrote:Supposedly yes
The defence could just rest on Monday

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Or the judge could knock it on the head.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
There is no evidence being heard tomorrow. It seems "the court will deal with legal matters" :scratch:
Here was me thinking the whole case was a legal matter.
Or will they discuss the catastrophic performance of the prosecution and polis?
Was wondering if the defence have spotted something procedurally not correct in the prosecution case which they intend to debate tomorrow, something significant enough to quash any guilty verdict?

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
Like the lack of evidence?

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
The jury to determine that though? Something more technical within the PSNI feckups perhaps?

Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
Top
Post Reply

Return to “View frae thae Hill”